جستجو در بخش : سوال جواب منابع اسلامی لغت نامه ها قوانین و مصوبات نقل قل ها
×

فرم ورود

ورود با گوگل ورود با گوگل ورود با تلگرام ورود با تلگرام
رمز عبور را فراموش کرده ام عضو نیستم، می خواهم عضو شوم
×

×

آدرس بخش انتخاب شده


جهت کپی کردن میتوانید از دکمه های Ctrl + C استفاده کنید
رویداد ها - امتیازات
در حال بارگذاری
×

رویداد ها - امتیازات

برای بررسی عملکرد فعالیت و امتیازات خود باید در وب سایت وارد باشید. در صورت عضویت از بخش بالای صفحه وارد شوید، در غیر این صورت از دکمه پایین، مستقیم به صفحه ثبت نام وارد شوید.

×
×

مالیات یا عوارض گناه

معنی: مالیات گناه ( به انگلیسی: sin tax) از نوع مالیاتهای تعدیلی یا شخصی است که بر برخی کالاها و خدماتی بسته می شود که استفاده از آنها نهی شده است، مثل الکل و توتون و تنباکو، شیرینی ها، نوشابه های غیر الکلی، فست فود، قهوه و قمار و...

قس انگلیسی

A sin tax is a kind of sumptuary tax: a tax specifically levied on certain generally socially proscribed goods and services, for example alcohol and tobacco, candies, soft drinks, fast foods, coffee, and gambling.

Contents
Summary

Sumptuary taxes are ostensibly used for reducing transactions involving something that society considers undesirable, and is thus a kind of sumptuary law. Sin tax is used for taxes on activities that are considered socially undesirable. Common targets of sumptuary taxes are alcohol and tobacco, gambling, and vehicles emitting excessive pollutants. Sumptuary tax on sugar and soft drinks has also been suggested. Some jurisdictions have also levied taxes on illegal drugs such as cocaine and marijuana.needed

The revenue generated by sin taxes is sometimes used for special projects, but might also be used in the ordinary budget. American cities and countries have used them to pay for stadiums, while in Sweden the tax for gambling is used for helping people with gambling problems. Acceptance of sumptuary taxes may be greater than income tax or sales tax.

Opposition to sin tax

Sin taxes have historically triggered rampant smuggling and black markets, especially when they create large price differences in neighboring jurisdictions.needed
Critics of sin tax argue that it is a regressive tax in nature and discriminates against the lower classes, since taxation of a product such as alcohol or cigarettes does not account for ability to pay, therefore poor people pay a greater amount of their income as tax.needed
Sin taxes are not normally value added in nature meaning that expensive, high-quality products more likely to be purchased by the wealthy will have the tax comprise a much smaller proportion of its final purchase price, thus ensuring that the lower classes pay a much greater proportion of their lower income in tax.needed
Sin taxes fail to affect consumers behaviors in the way that tax proponents suggest, for instance increasing smokers propensity to smoke high-tar, high-nicotine cigarettes when the per-pack price is raised and increasing the rate of people mixing their own drinks rather than buying pre-mix alcoholic spirits.
Critics also argue that the behavior affected by sin taxes are strictly personal and of no social consequence, and therefore should not be moderated by government.needed
Support for sin tax

Some argue tobacco and alcohol consumption or the behaviors associated with consumption or both are immoral, or "sinful", hence the label "sin tax". By raising the cost for certain products (here called immoral), they aim to force change upon peoples behavior.
Tobacco and alcohol consumption has been linked to a variety of medical problems. In the United States alone, over 440,000 people die annually from smoking tobacco. By making the cost of unhealthy behavior prohibitive, they hope to produce a healthier society.
Following the medical argument, some argue that consumers of tobacco and alcohol cause a greater financial burden on society by forcing others to pay for medical treatment of conditions stemming from such consumption, especially in most first-world countries with government-funded healthcare, and should be taxed extra to pay for the costs of their treatment.
Adam Smith supported the medical and moral arguments in The Wealth of Nations: “It has for some time been the policy of Great Britain to discourage the consumption of spirituous liquors, on account of their supposed tendency to ruin the health and corrupt the morals of the common people.” The moral, medical and financial arguments are occasionally considered in contemporary news settings.

Counter-arguments
Not all research supports the idea that alcohol and tobacco consumers financially burden societies. One study used a mathematical model to compare estimated health costs of obese persons, tobacco smokers, and "healthy-living people". Until age 56, obese persons had the highest estimated annual health expenditure. Tobacco smokers older than this had the highest estimated health costs of all groups, but since life expectancy is shorter for smokers and the obese, the "lifetime health expenditure was highest among healthy-living people." The model for this study used input parameters based on data from the Netherlands.
See also

Consumption tax
Excise
Fair tax
Green tax shift
Pigovian tax
References

^ Hartocollis, Anemona (2009-04-09). "New York Health Official Calls For Tax On Drinks With Sugar". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-03-27.
^ Williams, Richard;
Christ, Katelyn (July, 2009). "Taxing Sin". Mercatus.
^ "Alcopops sales down, but spirits booming". July 2008.
^ "Frequently Asked Questions on the Passage of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA)". FDA. 2009-08-10. Retrieved 2010-05-27.
^ Kang Beng Hoe (2010-01-19). "The role of excise as a sin tax". The Star online. Retrieved 2010-05-27.
^ Allen Johnson (2010-03-21). "Should my Diet Dew addiction be punished with a tax?". News & Record, Greensboro, NC. Retrieved 2010-05-27.
^ Van Baal, Pieter H. M.; Polder, Johan J.; De Wit, G. Ardine; Hoogenveen, Rudolf T.; Feenstra, Talitha L.; Boshuizen, Hendriek C.; Engelfriet, Peter M.; Brouwer, Werner B. F.. "Lifetime Medical Costs of Obesity: Prevention No Cure for Increasing Health Expenditure". PLoS Medicine (PLoS Medicine) 5 (2): e29. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050029. PMC 2225430. PMID 18254654. Retrieved 2009-09-21.
View page ratings
Rate this page
Whats this?
Trustworthy
Objective
Complete
Well-written
I am highly knowledgeable about this topic (optional)

Submit ratings
Categories: Personal taxes
... ادامه
912 | 0
نمایش تصویر
اطلاعات بیشتر واژه
آواشناسی:
منبع: واژه‌نامه آزاد
معادل ابجد: 1646
شمارگان هجا:
دیگر زبان ها
عربی
ضريبة | عبء ثقيل , رسم دفع , فرض ضريبة , أرهق , اتهم , حدد المقدار
تشریح نگارش (هوش مصنوعی)

کلمه «مالیات» و «عوارض» به‌طور عمومی به مفهوم هزینه‌هایی اشاره دارند که افراد یا شرکت‌ها باید به دولت بپردازند. این دو واژه به‌ویژه در زمینه‌های اقتصادی و قانونی مورد استفاده قرار می‌گیرند.

به‌عنوان یک قاعده زبانی و نگارشی برای این واژه‌ها:

  1. استفاده درست: کلمه «مالیات» به‌طور خاص به هزینه‌هایی اشاره دارد که دولت برای تأمین نیازهای عمومی از افراد و شرکت‌ها دریافت می‌کند، در حالی که «عوارض» معمولاً به هزینه‌هایی اشاره دارد که برای استفاده از یک سرویس یا امکانات خاص دریافت می‌شود، مانند عوارض جاده‌ای یا عوارض شهرداری.

  2. تطابق با متن: در نگارش، باید توجه داشت که از کلمات به‌طور صحیح با توجه به معنای آن‌ها استفاده شود تا مفهومی واضح و روشن منتقل شود.

  3. قواعد نگارشی: در جملات، توجه به نکتۀ نگارشی از جمله «نقطه‌گذاری» و «فاصله‌گذاری» بعد از استفاده از این واژه‌ها مهم است. همچنین در نوشتار رسمی، از زبان و ادبیات مناسب و دقیق استفاده شود.

  4. جملات نمونه:
    • «مالیات بر درآمد یکی از منابع اصلی درآمد دولت است.»
    • «عوارض شهرداری معمولاً برای تأمین خدمات عمومی در شهرها استفاده می‌شود.»

استفاده صحیح و دقیق از این کلمات می‌تواند به بهبود کیفیت نوشتار و انتقال واضح اطلاعات کمک کند.


500 کاراکتر باقی مانده

جعبه لام تا کام


وب سایت لام تا کام جهت نمایش استاندارد و کاربردی در تمامی نمایشگر ها بهینه شده است.

تبلیغات توضیحی


عرشیان از کجا شروع کنم ؟
تغییر و تحول با استاد سید محمد عرشیانفر

تبلیغات تصویری